🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

In Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to approve a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding statement demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not establish binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid foundation," stated a leading parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "supported by strong data".

Previously, interest grew behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering disturbing platform posts argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to design tools that are appropriate and suitable for young users," said a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is largely unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills demanding parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain individuals to follow this lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, additional nations are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

As this international conversation unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and others show that states globally are less and less prepared to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.